MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408994844 · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-22339-6

Regional differences in acute hospitalization risk associated with NO2 by cause, season, age, sex, and trend: an ecological time series study in Canada

2025· article· en· W4408994844 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Hwashin Hyun Shin, James Owen, Kimberly Mitchell, Marc Smith-Doiron, Parvin Dehghani

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityQueen's UniversityHealth Canada
FundersHealth Canada
KeywordsMedicineBiostatisticsEpidemiologyPoisson regressionPublic healthDemographyEcological studyDiseaseHeart diseaseEnvironmental healthPopulationInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) is a highly reactive gas produced mainly from burning fossil fuels. Exposure to NO 2 has been shown to impact public health worldwide. However, spatial and temporal variations in its effects by season, age, and sex have been underexamined. Methods We conducted an ecological time-series study based on about 20 million people (52% of Canadians in 2012) in three regions (Western, Central and Eastern Canada) over 17 years (1996–2012). We collected hourly NO 2 concentrations and temperatures, and daily counts of non-accidental all-cause, circulatory-, and respiratory-related hospitalizations, including more specific causes: ischemic heart disease, other heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, influenza/pneumonia, and chronic lower respiratory disease. We first estimated city-specific risks, applying over-dispersed generalized Poisson models, and then regional and national risks for each season, age-group, and sex using Bayesian hierarchical models. We also applied Sen’s test to detect linear trends in annual regional and national risks. Results We found significant NO 2 effects by cause, season, age, sex, and linear trend. For circulatory hospitalization, only Western Canada showed significant adverse effects for non-seniors (≤ 65) (1.7% with 95% credible interval of 0.3–3.2% per 10 ppb increase in NO 2 ), and for males for more specific cause, ischemic heart disease (2.3%, 0.1–4.5%). Regional differences were observed for circulatory but not respiratory hospitalizations. For example, the Western and Eastern regions were at significantly higher risk of circulatory hospitalization but not the Central region: 1.6% (0.2–3.0%) for the Western region; 2.0% (0.6–3.4%) for the Eastern region; and 0.8% (-0.3–2.0%) for the Central region. In particular, the Western region had a much higher risk of cerebrovascular disease hospitalization: 2.8% (1.1–4.6%) for the Western region; 0.1% (-3.0–3.1%) for the Central region; and 0.0% (-3.4–3.5%) for the Eastern region. However, no other regional differences were observed for other causes. Overall, there were noticeable increases in regional differences over time, particularly in the later years. Conclusions This study indicates harmful NO 2 effects on acute hospitalizations year-round: circulatory causes (cold season) and respiratory causes (warm season). Future work is warranted to investigate potential causes of observed regional differences using more community-related information such as socioeconomic status, health-care accessibility, and others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Public Health→Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→