MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408995994 · doi:10.1097/pas.0000000000002386

MEIS1::NCOA1 Primitive Spindle Cell Sarcoma of the Kidney

2025· article· en· W4408995994 on OpenAlexaff
Pedram Argani, Sintawat Wangsiricharoen, Maria Tretiakova, Yajuan J. Liu, Sara M. Falzarano, Katrina Collins, Fadi Brimo, John Gross, Ezra Baraban, Andrés Matoso, Kristina Wakeman, Christopher L. Corless, Tanaya Neff, Benjamin F. Smith, Ali Abdel Satir, Abbas Agaimy, Cristina R. Antonescu, Gregory W. Charville, Ankur R. Sangoi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsPathologyBiologySarcomaFusion geneDifferential diagnosisMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primitive sarcomas harboring the MEIS1::NCOA2 gene fusion were originally described in the kidney in 2018, and subsequently reported in other organs. These variably cellular neoplasms feature monomorphic primitive plump spindle cells forming nodules and whorls in addition to nondescript fascicular, solid, and storiform patterns. They lack skeletal muscle differentiation in contrast to the primarily intraosseous rhabdomyosarcomas that harbor the same gene fusion. We describe 7 new primary primitive renal sarcomas with MEIS1::NCOA1 gene fusions. Although their morphology overlaps with that described in MEIS1::NCOA2 renal sarcoma, 3 of the 7 cases contained adipose tissue. The majority had intimately admixed entrapped cystic epithelial elements and demonstrated patchy immunoreactivity for estrogen receptor and nuclear labeling for WT1 protein, leading to the differential diagnosis of malignant mixed epithelial stromal tumor (MEST) in 4 cases and metanephric stromal tumor in one. The neoplasms demonstrate a broad spectrum of clinicopathologic features ranging from a bland low-grade neoplasm that metastasized 9 years after diagnosis to a high-grade sarcoma with multiple recurrences, ultimately leading to patient death in under 1 year. In summary, MEIS1::NCOA1 primitive sarcomas overlap with the previously described MEIS1::NCOA2 primitive renal sarcomas and represent a distinctive renal neoplasm that can be mistaken for malignant MEST. Grade ranges from low to high but even low-grade neoplasms require long-term clinical follow-up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Surgical PathologySame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207