MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408997145 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.2.033

ALL-CAUSE CONSTRUCT REOPERATION (INCLUDING FIXATION FOR POSTOPERATIVE PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURE) OF THE FIRST 1,000 EXETER V40 FEMORAL STEMS PERFORMED AT THE PRINCESS ELIZABETH ORTHOPAEDIC CENTRE, EXETER

2025· article· en· W4408997145 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tom Krause, Robert Morton, Sarah L. Whitehouse, Jonathan Evans

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeriprostheticMedicineSurgeryFemoral fractureFixation (population genetics)Orthopedic surgeryFemurArthroplastyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Exeter V40 femoral stem is a cemented polished taper-slip, stainless steel design, introduced in 2000 and the most used femoral component in the National Joint Registry (NJR). The NJR has reported excellent long-term revision outcomes for constructs using the stem combined with many acetabular components. Recent studies have highlighted the high proportion of post-operative peri-prosthetic femoral fractures (POPFF) treated with fixation rather than revision and therefore not included in NJR annual reports. We aimed to review the first 1000 hip replacements using this stem to estimate the all-cause construct survival including fixation for POPFF. We reviewed the first 1016 constructs using an Exeter V40 femoral stem recorded in the Exeter hip database between December 2000 and October 2004. Individual patient records were reviewed for all patients. Patients were censored either at death, revision, fracture fixation, or at the time of the most recent review with evidence of the original hip being in situ. The mean age at primary operation was 69.6 years (range 38, 96) with 58.5% patients reported as female. 35.7% of cases had a consultant as the lead surgeon. Seven cup designs were used as part of the construct with 60.9% using a contemporary flanged acetabular component. 32 patients underwent revision of any part of the construct (including four for POPFF) and 16 underwent fixation of a POPFF. Four Vancouver A fractures were identified and were all managed without surgery. All-cause construct failure including fixation for POPFF using Kaplan-Meier at 10 years was 2.0% (95%CI 1.1, 3.0) and at 20 years was 7.1% (95%CI 4.9, 9.2). The Prosthesis Time Incident Rate (PTIR) for all-cause failure was 3.39 failures per 1000 prostheses years at risk when fixation for POPFF was included, compared to 2.28 failures per 1000 prosthesis years when it was not. When fixation of POPFF is included as an endpoint, the survival of the Exeter V40 femoral stem in this cohort of 1000 patients remains well within NICE benchmarks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastyFrench-language works237,207