Anatomical Changes After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Changes in the bony structures of the nose and sinuses such as the medialization of the lamina papyracea and enophthalmos have been reported after sinus surgery. Evidence for the persistence of inferior turbinate (IT) position after IT outfracture is lacking. Objectives: To evaluate for anatomical changes of the IT, lamina and the globes, after sinus surgery and the durability of inferior turbinate outfracture. Methods: A total of forty-four patients who underwent revision endoscopic sinus surgery that included complete ethmoidectomy and IT outfracture were matched. Pre- and post-operative computed tomography scans (CT) were used for evaluating and measuring the anatomical changes in different planes. The posterior globe position in the axial plane, the distance between the lamina papyracea (IODAxial, IODCoronal) in coronal and axial planes and the distance from the IT to the septum (ITM) and the lateral nasal wall (ITL) were measured. Results: There were 16 women and 28 men. Mean follow-up time (time from procedure to post-operative CT scan) was 38.9 ± 20.1 months. Statistically significant lateralization of the IT was observed with ITL (95%CI 1.1 mm to 1.5 mm p < 0.0001) and ITM (95%CI −1.5 mm to −1.1 mm; p < 0.0001). No statistically significant differences were seen in IODAxial and IODCoronal in pre-op and post-op CT scans. (p = 0.23 and p = 0.7, respectively) and no significant displacement of the globe in antero-posterior direction was seen (p = 0.915). Conclusions: IT outfracture appears to have a durable effect on IT position that lasts for several years. Ethmoidectomy did not cause the medialization of the laminae nor altered the position of the globes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".