MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hepatorenal Syndrome: direct treatment costs and characteristics of patients admitted to intensive care

2025· article· en· W4409000030 on OpenAlex
Franciele Robes Hortelã, Rodrigo Sfredo Kruger, Vítor Augusto Ribeiro Oliveira, Hipólito Carraro, Dominique Araújo Muzzillo, Sérgio Cândido Kowalski

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEinstein (São Paulo) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHepatorenal syndromeMedicineIntensive care medicineIntensive careSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Hepatorenal Syndrome is a potentially reversible syndrome of endstage cirrhosis. It is a severe complication of cirrhosis that involves a high mortality rate and a significant economic impact on the healthcare system. This study shows the costs of the resources used for disease management and complications to be Int$14,189. Quantifying this figure contributes to an understanding of the economic impact of Hepatorenal Syndrome on patient survival. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the direct medical costs incurred in Brazil for the treatment of Hepatorenal Syndrome in intensive care and intermediate therapy care units, and to investigate the impact of this syndrome on patient survival. METHODS: This longitudinal observational retrospective study included patients with Hepatorenal Syndrome admitted to the intensive and intermediate therapy care units of a public tertiary hospital. The cost generated by each patient was the sum of the direct costs and overheads. RESULTS: Forty-four patients with 49 episodes of suspected Hepatorenal Syndrome were analyzed, 73% male, with a mean age of 55 years (SD= 11). Diagnosis was presumed in 21 episodes (43%), because not all of the Ascites International Club's criteria were met. Alcoholic cirrhosis was the main etiology (43%); 59% of the patients were Child-Pugh Class C at admission, with a mean (SD) model for end-stage liver disease score of 24.6 (8). Seventy-seven percent of the patients died, 32% from multiple organ failure, 29% of septic shock and 27% of hypovolemic shock. The median (IQR) of the total treatment cost for each patient was Int$14,819 (8,732-23,854). The median (IQR) length of intensive care unit stay in intensive care was 11 days (7-19). Patients with a presumed diagnosis did not have a higher hospitalization cost (p=0.249) than those with true Hepatorenal Syndrome. CONCLUSION: The treatment of Hepatorenal Syndrome represents a significant cost, and new resource allocation in strategic areas, such as the treatment and monitoring of patients with cirrhosis, is necessary to improve their outcomes. BACKGROUND: ■ The treatment of Hepatorenal Syndrome places a huge economic burden on healthcare systems. BACKGROUND: ■ Cost analysis studies of Hepatorenal Syndrome management can help to rationally allocate resources in healthcare. BACKGROUND: ■ Timely diagnosis and management of Hepatorenal Syndrome may reduce mortality, resource utilization and costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it