MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409002075 · doi:10.3390/nano15070525

Hyperbranched Polyethylene Ionomers Containing Quaternary Ammonium Ions and Their Functionalization of Nanomaterials

2025· review· en· W4409002075 on OpenAlexaff
Zhibin Ye, Jalal Rahmatinejad, Bahareh Raisi, Peiyao Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueNanomaterials · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurface modificationPolyethyleneNanomaterialsMaterials sciencePolymerPolymerizationIonic bondingPolymer chemistryChemical engineeringChemistryOrganic chemistryNanotechnologyIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ionomers containing a small number of ionic side groups are a unique class of polymers with some valuable properties and distinct applications. To date, commercially important ionomers are exclusively anionomers that contain covalently bonded anions and are synthesized commonly by radical polymerization. The catalytic synthesis of polyethylene-based cationomers is challenging, while it is attractive due to the low cost of ethylene stocks and less stringent polymerization conditions, along with their desirable properties and broadened scope of commercial applications. Advances in catalyst technology-specifically, Pd-diimine catalysts-have recently enabled the synthesis of a class of hyperbranched polyethylene cationomers that are designed to contain quaternary ammonium cations. With their unique hydrophobic hyperbranched polyethylene backbone, this class of ionomers enables the successful functionalization of negatively surface-charged nanomaterials, thus improving the processing and application of the latter. This review summarizes the developments of this class of ionomers, including their synthesis, properties, and functionalization of various nanomaterials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanomaterialsSame topicDendrimers and Hyperbranched PolymersFrench-language works237,207