Uncertainty-Aware δ-GLMB Filtering for Multi-Target Tracking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The δ-GLMB filter is an analytic solution to the multi-target Bayes recursion used in multi-target tracking. It extends the Generalised Labelled Multi-Bernoulli (GLMB) framework by providing an efficient and scalable implementation while preserving track identities, making it a widely used approach in the field. Theoretically, the δ-GLMB filter handles uncertainties in measurements in its filtering procedure. However, in practice, degeneration of the measurement quality affects the performance of this filter. In this paper, we discuss the effects of increasing measurement uncertainty on the δ-GLMB filter and also propose two heuristic methods to improve the performance of the filter in such conditions. The base idea of the proposed methods is to utilise the information stored in the history of the filtering procedure, which can be used to decrease the measurement uncertainty effects on the filter. Since GLMB filters have shown good results in the field of multi-target tracking, an uncertainty-immune δ-GLMB can serve as a strong tool in this area. In this study, the results indicate that the proposed heuristic ideas can improve the performance of filtering in the presence of uncertain observations. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that the proposed methods enhance track continuity and robustness, particularly in scenarios with low detection rates and high clutter, while maintaining computational feasibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".