Unified Microwave Terahertz Waveguide Coupler for Multiband Wireless Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, a microwave (MW) and terahertz (THz) composite waveguide coupler for multiband wireless systems is proposed and demonstrated. Such a very large frequency ratio (more than <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$20\times $ </tex-math></inline-formula>) of the proposed coupler is made possible thanks to a composite waveguide technique where the center strip of a coplanar waveguide (CPW) is replaced by a substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW) block. In this way, the dual-mode operation, i.e., quasi-TEM mode and TE<sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">10</sub> mode, can be enabled simultaneously at different frequencies. In addition, by adjusting the SIW width, the operating frequency of the quasi-TEM mode and the TE<sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">10</sub> mode can be reassigned. All the advantages known for CPW couplers and SIW couplers are inherited in the proposed waveguide coupler. To validate this scheme, experimental prototypes are developed and fabricated on a thin-film miniature hybrid MW-integrated circuit (MHMIC) process. Measured results confirm the good THz performance as well as MW performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".