Indian Ocean History for the Age of Non-Alignment: The ‘Moorish Connection’ of North Africa and Sri Lanka
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Western scholarship on the Indian Ocean rarely takes into account the modern indigenous historiography of the region that emerged in dialogue with European depictions. This article traces the institutional then historiographical development of a Moorish identity in postcolonial Ceylon (from 1972 known as ‘Sri Lanka’), with a particular focus on The Moorish Connection, a history book published by the Moors Islamic Cultural Home to coincide with the 5th Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement, held in 1976 in Colombo. Like most other colonial and postcolonial Lankan Moors, the author of The Moorish Connection was unable to read the Arabic language of his purported ancestors, forcing him to rely on Orientalist works collected in the library of the Moors Islamic Cultural Home that commissioned his book. This produced a kind of nominative historical illusion whereby, when explored through the library of Orientalism, the English (and formerly Portuguese) name of the Moors germinated into narratives of an ancient ‘Moorish connection’ with distant Tunisia and Morocco. As a contribution to the neglected emic formulations of the Indian Ocean’s past, the article reconstructs the development of this Indian Ocean—and Mediterranean—self-history of the Moors through the colonial then postcolonial periods, culminating in its geopolitical deployment amid the soft power diplomacy of the Non-Aligned Movement and the postcolonial forging of new ‘South-South’ alliances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".