MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409017078 · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2025.106298

Enhancing public transportation sustainability: Insights from electric bus scheduling and charge optimization

2025· article· en· W4409017078 on OpenAlexaff
Foroogh Behnia, Seyyed Sajad Mousavi Nejad Souq, Beth‐Anne Schuelke‐Leech, Mitra Mirhassani

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainable Cities and Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainabilityPublic transportScheduling (production processes)Charge (physics)Automotive engineeringTransport engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceEnvironmental economicsEconomicsOperations managementPhysicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents a joint optimization model for optimizing the scheduling and charging of electric buses in urban transit systems, integrating fleet size determination, trip scheduling, and charging infrastructure planning. The model is solved using a genetic algorithm and validated through constrained particle swarm optimization . Results demonstrate that by efficiently incorporating time-of-use pricing , optimized partial charging, and dynamic speed variations, the model achieves a 2.5% cost reduction compared to full charging and improves operational efficiency by over 7% within changing speed scenarios. Sensitivity analyses confirm the model’s robustness, identifying the minimum charge duration of 15 min and discharge depth of 90% as economically optimal. The study provides valuable insights for transit agencies seeking to optimize electric bus fleet operations and transition to more sustainable and cost-effective public transportation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSustainable Cities and SocietySame topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207