Combustion and Emissions Improvement of Engine Idling Via Advanced Ignition Strategies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">During engine idling, the low engine speed, typically from 600 rpm to 800 rpm, together with the low throttle opening angle, makes it challenging for a proper fuel air mixing process. The uneven intake charge distribution and high portion of internal EGR because of the inefficient gas exchange process further make the air fuel ratio unstable, which is challenging for a robust ignition and combustion process. In this paper, the challenge of achieving proper combustion phasing while maintaining acceptable combustion stability is investigated, and a specially designed common-coil pack was utilized to improve engine idling performance by supplying prolonged ignition duration and elevated discharge current amplitude. The common-coil pack, which comprises three parallel connected ignition coils, was shared by all 4 cylinders of the engine. The ignition strategy shows the capability to advance the combustion phasing for higher IMEP output, while maintaining the combustion stability, and reduce engine out emissions.</div></div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".