MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Lowering the Peak to Average Power Ratio by using the PTS method for high-speed application systems

2025· article· en· W4409019510 on OpenAlexaff
Pushpendu Kanjilal, Арун Кумар, Aziz Nanthaamornphong, Soumitra Bhowmick

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower (physics)Computer scienceAutomotive engineeringEngineeringPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orthogonal Time-Frequency Space is a promising modulation waveform for beyond-5G or 6G communication systems: superior robustness in high mobility and multipaths is achieved from the delay Doppler domain; however, one severe challenge of this OTFS was its high peak-to-average ratio of power, constraining the linearity of efficient power amplifiers at the transmitter which degrades further the overall performance of the entire system. This paper presents a new application of the Partial Transmit Sequence (PTS) method in reducing the PAPR for OTFS systems, which will ensure compatibility with future wireless networks that have stringent requirements. The PTS is a distortion less technique that divides the input signal into sub-blocks and applies optimized phase factors to reduce the peak power of the signal. It will help to eliminate computational complexity existing with traditional PTS and incorporates enhanced optimization techniques like heuristics algorithm, reduced space searching, hence ensuring a dramatic PAPR reduction with complexity that is minimized. Simulation analysis proved the ability of this proposed work for achieving efficient results in lowering the PAPR with relatively little effect on the bit error rate performances. The results demonstrate the feasibility of PTS-based PAPR reduction to further improve the energy efficiency, spectral efficiency, and reliability of OTFS systems, thereby making it an attractive solution for beyond 5G communication scenarios. The numerical results reveals that the proposed PTS obtain an energy saving of $\mathbf{2 5 \%}$ and reduce the PAPR by 3.9 dB to 5.8 dB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207