One Lovely Hour: Food as a Tool for Empathy in Designing for Culture, Aging, and Care
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract More than a necessity, food can be a way to create a connection to identity, culture, and a sense of belonging. In this study, we investigate the impact of lived experience on the perception of food based on the form, colour, and texture of what is presented to us. These workshops were undertaken in academic settings: a conference on dementia (3 participants) and a design studio classroom (10 participants). Our findings point to the connection between lived experiences and the perception of food. The workshops heightened participant awareness and empathy regarding how food affects memory and emotional well-being, particularly for immigrant older adults living with dementia in long-term care (LTC). The findings contributed to (a) a design brief for culturally specific assistive tableware and (b) suggested that experiential food workshops are a valuable, low-barrier method for enhancing caregiver empathy for improving LTC quality. Further studies will evaluate the resulting tableware design and its impact on LTC mealtime.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".