Ayurveda Management of Menorrhagia (Raktapradara): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In India, heavy menstrual bleeding or menorrhagia (Raktapradara) constitutes about 15% to 20% of all gynecological admissions in an institution. Of these, 43% of patients are aged 20-40 years. This condition is worsening because of the high prevalence of anemia among Indian women. Menorrhagia can have a significant impact on women's lives. Medical treatment is usually the first choice in excessive bleeding, but it reduces menstrual blood loss by only 50%, and up to 50% of women undergo surgical treatment within 5 years. However, none of these treatments proved their definite efficacy in spite of the high price and side effects. This condition presents a major financial burden on health care services. In Ayurveda, encouraging work has been done on the compound drug Ashokarishta, and the drug Trinakantamani pishti is indicated in Ayurvedic classics and the Ayurvedic Formulary of India. Also, these medicines have been used in Ayurvedic practice for a long time. However, no clinical trial has been carried out on these formulations. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of Ayurvedic intervention in the management of menorrhagia, and the secondary objective is to assess the efficacy of Ayurvedic intervention on the quality of life of the women with menorrhagia. METHODS: This ongoing study is an open-label, interventional, randomized controlled trial, with a sample size of 140 in the treatment and control groups combined (including 20% dropouts), and will be carried out within the duration of 36 months. Participants in the treatment group will receive Ayurvedic treatment, that is, 20 mL of Ashokarishta, 250 mg of Trinakantamani pishti, and 1 iron and folic acid tablet (100 mg of elemental iron and 1.5 mg of folic acid) twice a day orally for 3 months. Participants in the control group will receive a 500-mg tranexamic acid tablet thrice a day for 7 days from the first day of menses for 3 cycles and 1 iron and folic acid tablet twice a day orally for 3 months. The primary outcomes are changes in the amount of uterine bleeding evaluated by the Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart, changes in the duration of bleeding, and attainment of a normal quantity of blood loss during the interval of cycles. The secondary outcome is changes in the Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire. RESULTS: As of December 2024, a total of 79 patients have been enrolled. Data analysis should be completed by February 2026. The study will be reported following standard guidelines for reporting randomized controlled trials. Clinical results will be disseminated through conferences and peer-reviewed publications in a relevant journal. CONCLUSIONS: The Ayurvedic approach may provide an evidence-based therapeutic tactic for the management of menorrhagia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry India CTRI/2023/05/052929; https://tinyurl.com/3cd6mxrn. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/60801.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".