MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409031872 · doi:10.1049/icp.2025.0871

Assessing K-12 broadband needs: data and industry insights

2025· article· en· W4409031872 on OpenAlexaff
Salam Ismaeel, Nihad Al-Juboori, Mirza Kamaludeen

Bibliographic record

VenueIET conference proceedings. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Systems and Policy
Canadian institutionsIBI Group (Canada)Humber Polytechnic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadbandBusinessData scienceComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Internet has emerged as an indispensable tool in various facets of modern daily life. Within the realm of education, particularly in K-12 schools, its role is transformative and pivotal. The Internet’s integration has initiated a paradigm shift in the pedagogical landscape, offering an extensive array of educational resources. This transformation not only enriches the learning process but also introduces students to innovative modes of remote collaboration with peers on a global scale. Concurrently, educators increasingly rely on the Internet to access the most current and pertinent educational content, elevating the effectiveness, richness, and clarity of their instructional materials. This surge in usage has significantly increased the Internet’s role within K-12 educational settings, becoming a central catalyst in the educational development process. This paper aims to elucidate the driving forces behind this surge in Internet usage. It presents a comparative analysis of Internet utilization before and after the onset of the global pandemic, highlighting the evolution and impacts on educational practices within K-12 institutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.015
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET conference proceedings.Same topicEducation Systems and PolicyFrench-language works237,207