La singularité de l’enseignement de l’éthique à l’école : une analyse critique de la notion de responsabilité éthique dans le Plan d’études vaudois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse la visée prioritaire de la discipline scolaire « éthique » dans le Plan d’études vaudois. Selon ce dernier, la visée de l’enseignement de l’éthique est de « développer le sens d’une responsabilité éthique » (CIIP / DFJC VD, 2019, p. 1). La signification du « sens d’une responsabilité éthique » est analysée grâce à la théorie de la compréhension morale de la philosophe américaine Margaret Urban Walker. Suivant cette analyse, cet enseignement viserait le développement d’une compétence complexe de positionnement collaboratif. Cette compétence situe la formation autonome du jugement moral au sein d’une large trame d’apprentissage. Enfin, ce dialogue entre la didactique de l’éthique et l’épistémologie morale féministe fournit une analyse critique de la notion d’autonomie, qui permet un regard neuf sur les postures enseignantes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.065 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".