Proteomics and personalized PDX models identify treatment for a progressive malignancy within an actionable timeframe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genomics has transformed the diagnostic landscape of pediatric malignancies by identifying and integrating actionable features that refine diagnosis, classification, and treatment. Yet, translating precision oncology data into effective therapies for hard-to-cure childhood, adolescent, and young adult malignancies remains a significant challenge. We present the case for combining proteomics with patient-derived xenograft models to identify personalized treatment for an adolescent with primary and metastatic spindle epithelial tumor with thymus-like elements (SETTLE). Within two weeks of biopsy, proteomics identified elevated SHMT2 as a target for therapy with the anti-depressant sertraline. Drug response was confirmed within two months using a personalized chicken chorioallantoic membrane model of the patient's SETTLE tumor. Following failure of cytotoxic chemotherapy and second-line therapy, the patient received sertraline treatment and showed decreased tumor growth rates, albeit with clinically progressive disease. We demonstrate that proteomics and fast-track xenograft models provide supportive pre-clinical data in a clinically meaningful timeframe to impact clinical practice. By this, we show that proteome-guided and functional precision oncology are feasible and valuable complements to the current genome-driven precision oncology practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".