An inflammatory biomarker signature of response to CAR-T cell therapy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Disease progression is a substantial challenge in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) undergoing chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy. Here we present InflaMix (INFLAmmation MIXture Model), an unsupervised quantitative model integrating 14 pre-CAR-T infusion laboratory and cytokine measures capturing inflammation and end-organ function. Developed using a cohort of 149 patients with NHL, InflaMix revealed an inflammatory signature associated with a high risk of CAR-T treatment failure, including increased hazard of death or relapse (hazard ratio, 2.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.60–4.91; P < 0.001). Three independent cohorts comprising 688 patients with NHL from diverse treatment centers were used to validate our approach. InflaMix consistently and reproducibly identified patients with a higher likelihood of disease relapse and mortality, and it provided supplementary predictive value beyond established prognostic markers, including tumor burden. Moreover, InflaMix exhibited robust performance in cases with missing data, maintaining accuracy when considering only six readily available laboratory measures. These findings show that InflaMix is a valuable tool for point-of-care clinical decision-making in patients with NHL undergoing CAR-T therapy. A preinfusion circulatory inflammation biomarker-based signature predicts the likelihood of treatment failure in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma who were treated with CAR-T cell therapy, with an inflammatory cluster assignment being prognostic of clinical response and survival outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".