MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409040347 · doi:10.1097/sap.0000000000004289

Impact of Chemotherapy and Radiation on Breast Sensation After Immediate Reconstruction

2025· article· en· W4409040347 on OpenAlexaff
Nancy Qin, Carson Gundlach, Makayla Kochheiser, Grant G. Black, Anna M. Vaeth, Yunchan Chen, Ashley Zhang, Sophia Arbuiso, Ethan Romero, Marcos Lu Wang, Hao Huang, David M. Otterburn

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Plastic Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreast Implant and Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsColumbia College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDIEP flapBreast reconstructionMastectomySurgeryBreast cancerSensationChemotherapyRadiation therapyImplantInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: This study explores the impact of chemotherapy and radiation therapy (XRT) on breast sensation in patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. METHODS: This prospective study, conducted from 2019 to 2024, focused on patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate implant-based or neurotized deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction. Neurosensory testing was performed preoperatively and at defined postoperative intervals using a pressure-specified sensory device. Patients were stratified by type of reconstruction and oncologic treatment: neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, preoperative XRT, and adjuvant XRT. Sensation scores were compared between each treatment group and its corresponding control group using an unpaired two-sample t test. Subsequently, a mixed-effects backward linear regression model was used to assess the relative impact of each treatment. RESULTS: A total of 291 patients were analyzed, including 154 patients (274 breasts) who underwent implant-based reconstruction and 137 patients (248 breasts) who underwent DIEP flap reconstruction. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative XRT were associated with temporary reductions in outer breast sensation at 3 to 12 months postoperatively, whereas adjuvant XRT resulted in widespread and persistent sensory deficits. Adjuvant chemotherapy had no impact on sensation in implant-based reconstructions but was associated with long-term decreased sensation in the outer breast regions of DIEP flap reconstructions. Regression analysis identified adjuvant XRT (β = 13.06), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (β = 5.99), and higher BMI (β = 0.71) as significant risk factors for diminished breast sensation (P = 0.05), whereas neurotized DIEP flap reconstruction (β = -7.82) and a greater time since surgery (β = -1.56) were protective factors (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the detrimental impacts of adjunctive oncologic therapies, particularly adjuvant XRT, on breast sensation. This information can aid in preoperative counseling and help establish realistic expectations for breast cancer patients considering mastectomy and reconstruction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Plastic SurgerySame topicBreast Implant and ReconstructionFrench-language works237,207