MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409049652 · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3556905

Pre-Assembly Core Loss Measurement of Electric Motor Cores: A Review of Conventional and Advanced Technologies

2025· review· en· W4409049652 on OpenAlexafffund
Sudesh V. Pathirannahalage, Lukasz Mierczak, Berker Bilgin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsBrock UniversityMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsCore (optical fiber)Computer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate core loss measurement considering manufacturing effects is essential for improving motor efficiency and reliability. This paper explores pre-assembly core loss measurement techniques in electric motors, focusing on the influence of manufacturing processes and the efficacy of core loss measurement methods. Traditional methods such as the Epstein frame, Single Sheet Tester (SST), and toroidal core measurement are discussed, along with recent advancements in measurement techniques. Experimental methods with an excitation yoke placed inside a stacked stator for core loss measurement, mainly under an alternating magnetic field, are presented. The application of advanced core loss measurement in industrial settings highlights that automation plays a vital role in enhancing measurement efficiency. The gaps in the existing literature and specific areas where further research is needed are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207