Genetic architecture of the <i>S</i> -locus supergene revealed in a tetraploid distylous species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Heterostyly is a polymorphic floral adaptation controlled by supergenes and maintained in populations by disassortative mating. The molecular basis of distyly has been investigated in several unrelated families. Previous studies have been limited to diploid species and have not included Rubiaceae, which has the highest number of heterostylous species. Here, we investigate the genetic architecture of tetraploid Schizomussaenda henryi (Rubiaceae) to identify candidate style-length genes, evidence for hemizygosity and the potential role of gene duplication in the evolution of the S -locus. Chromosome-level genome assemblies and transcriptomic approaches identified the S -locus region comprised of four hemizygous genes. The candidate gene SchzAUX22 may regulate style length and filament growth by acting in the auxin signaling pathway. Comparative studies of the two sub-genomes of S. henryi indicated strong similarities and no significant sub-genome dominance, as expected from autotetraploidy. Evidence from haplotype-resolved assemblies of a short-styled plant indicated that it possessed the ssSS genotype, consistent with autotetraploidy, which was estimated to have originated ∼3.6 Mya. Analysis of Ks values between S -locus genes and their paralogs indicated that the S -locus likely originated through stepwise duplication. Our study provides comprehensive genomic analysis of distyly in a polyploid and demonstrates that despite whole genome doubling the S -locus supergene remains intact and functional as an outbreeding mechanism. Our results contrast with many other heterostylous lineages where polyploidy is associated with breakdown of the polymorphism and transitions to self-fertilization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".