MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409057905 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2025.3548115

Robust Precision Motion Control of Dual-Drive Gantry-Type Cartesian Robot With Workspace Constraints

2025· article· en· W4409057905 on OpenAlexaff
Wenxin Wang, Jun Ma, Zilong Cheng, Zicheng Zhu, Yuanjie Xian, Clarence W. de Silva, Tong Heng Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTeleoperation and Haptic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkspaceCartesian coordinate systemDual (grammatical number)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceRobotMotion controlCartesian coordinate robotType (biology)Control (management)Control engineeringRobot controlMathematicsArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMobile robotGeometryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automated motion control tasks would typically arise as essential and critical parts of the operations for complex industrial systems when there exists multiple necessary requirements, such as high precision, low energy consumption, and effective collision avoidance. These motion control tasks invariably also involve workspace constraints to the system. Also as an inevitably encountered challenge, various factors bring model uncertainty and external disturbance to the system, leading to the deviations between the obtained solution and the optimum, particularly for systems with nonlinear characteristics. Considering these issues, this article proposes a robust precision motion control scheme via iterative linear quadratic regulator for planar motion tasks of a flexure-joint gantry-type Cartesian robot. Essentially in the methodology developed here, the model uncertainty and external disturbance of the gantry robot are suppressed through an integral adaptive sliding-mode controller, and a projection scheme is deployed to deal with various constraints from the workspace so that the gantry robot can automatically adjust its trajectories in planar motion tasks. In addition, the desired convergence outcome of the proposed method and also the resulting closed-loop stability of the system are rigorously proved. This approach, thus, renders it possible to achieve improved system performance even when there does not exist a fully accurate system model (which is rather typical in practical situations). Moreover, real-time experiments in two types of motion tasks are designed to validate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.931

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE/ASME Transactions on MechatronicsSame topicTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsFrench-language works237,207