MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409058584 · doi:10.1109/tbme.2025.3556794

A Physics-Informed Diffusion Model for Super-Resolved Reconstruction of Optical Coherence Tomography Data

2025· article· en· W4409058584 on OpenAlexafffund
Nima Abbasi, Kostadinka Bizheva

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Coherence Tomography Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsOptical coherence tomographyCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Optical tomographyPhysicsTomographyStatistical physicsOpticsMedical physicsDiffusionIterative reconstructionComputer scienceComputer visionQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: This study introduces a physics-informed diffusion model (PIDM) for super-resolution (SR) reconstruction of optical coherence tomography (OCT) data. METHODS: An optimization framework was developed for maximizing the likelihood of observing an OCT image in the dataset, given the super-resolved reconstruction from a physics-informed diffusion model (PIDM) that reverses the degradations in OCT images. The image degradations were modeled as a serialization of three processes accounting for the effects of defocus, speckle noise, and digital sampling in OCT images. An analytical model for light-propagation model and a statistical model for speckle noise were derived based on the physical properties of the OCT setup. These models were then integrated with a diffusion model to reverse the degradations caused by defocus blur and digital sampling, minimizing susceptibility to noise and defocus-induced artifacts. RESULTS: The proposed method was employed for reconstructing images of a standard resolution target, plant tissue, and in vivo human cornea, using the complex OCT data acquired with a line-scan OCT (LS-OCT) system. The results from the PIDM exhibit improved sharpness and contrast compared to the images resulting from a few baseline methods such as standalone super-resolution using DM. CONCLUSION: Complementing DM with the physics of OCT could be a viable solution for obtaining high-fidelity SR reconstruction of OCT images. SIGNIFICANCE: This work harnesses the power of diffusion models for super-resolution in OCT images. Such development could potentially enhance cellular-resolution OCT imaging of ophthalmic tissues, where high-fidelity images are crucial for accurate diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical EngineeringSame topicOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207