Research on the Design of Tang Dynasty Hunting Pattern Cultural and Creative Products Based on Narrative Design
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hunting pattern is a popular style of Tang Dynasty textiles, which reflects the social culture and aesthetic interest of the time and is a witness to the fusion of Chinese and foreign cultural exchanges. From the perspective of narrative design, this paper takes the Chinese traditional hunting spirit as the core and cultural and creative products as the final expression, to realize the innovative design application of Tang Dynasty textile patterns. From the analysis of the three narrative elements of the Tang Dynasty hunting pattern, namely, narrative theme, plot, and expression level, the narrative design is developed by combining the product shape, material, and color. The design emphasizes the fun of the product and the interaction with the users to promote the users' in-depth experience and cognition of traditional Chinese culture, which provides a methodological guide for the practice of narrative design in cultural and creative products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it