MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409062581 · doi:10.1002/lpor.202500013

Integrated Microwave Photonics Multi‐Parameter Measurement System

2025· article· en· W4409062581 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yong Zheng, Zhen Han, Liheng Wang, Pu Zhang, Yongheng Jiang, Huifu Xiao, Xudong Zhou, Mingrui Yuan, Mei Xian Low, Aditya Dubey, Thach G. Nguyen, Qinfen Hao, Guanghui Ren, Arnan Mitchell, Yonghui Tian

Bibliographic record

VenueLaser & Photonics Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Research CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaRMIT UniversityOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and ForestryNatural Science Foundation of Gansu ProvinceAustralian National Fabrication Facility
KeywordsMicrowavePhotonicsComputer scienceElectronic engineeringOptoelectronicsPhysicsTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Driven by the growing demands in wireless communication, remote sensing and emerging 6G networks, research on microwave signal measurement techniques has attached intensive attention. Unlike conventional electronic‐based approaches, photonics chip‐based microwave signal measurement systems offer significant advantages, including broad operation bandwidth, reduced weight, and enhanced resistance to unwanted electromagnetic interference. Despite notable progress in integrated microwave photonic measurement systems, the majority remains constrained by bandwidth below 30 GHz, primarily due to the limitation of modulators. Furthermore, most previous studies focus on the measurement of one single parameter, typically the frequency, limiting their applications in more complex, real‐world situations. Here, an on‐chip photonic microwave multi‐parameter measurement system is presented on the thin‐film lithium niobate (TFLN) platform. The system enables measurement of microwave frequency, phase, and amplitude, offering an ultra‐high bandwidth (up to 60 GHz) with low root‐mean‐squared errors: 450 MHz for frequency, 3.43° for phase, and 1.64% for amplitude. Additionally, the system is validated by the time‐domain reconstruction of unknown sinusoidal microwave signals based on measurement results. This demonstration further broadens the scope of integrated TFLN photonic devices for microwave signal measurement, providing a viable solution to the bandwidth limitations of existing microwave networks and addressing the increasing demands of future information‐driven technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaser & Photonics ReviewSame topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207