Integrating digital twins with neural networks for adaptive control of automotive suspension systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an innovative approach to enhancing the adaptive control of automotive suspension systems by integrating digital twin (DT) technology with artificial neural networks (ANNs). The proposed method leverages real-time data from DTs to dynamically adjust the suspension settings, optimizing ride comfort and vehicle handling. A detailed simulation model of a vehicle's suspension system was developed using MATLAB/Simulink, with the DT providing continuous feedback to the ANN-based adaptive controller. The effectiveness of the proposed method was evaluated through a series of simulations under various road conditions and driving scenarios. Results show that the integrated DT and ANN approach improves ride comfort by 8.46% compared to traditional Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) control methods, as measured by the reduction in vertical acceleration of the vehicle's body. Additionally, vehicle handling was enhanced by 14.02%, demonstrated by a decrease in the lateral acceleration during cornering. The predictive maintenance capability of the system also showed a 5.72% reduction in suspension component wear, extending the overall lifespan of the system. These findings suggest that the integration of DTs with neural networks (NN) offers significant improvements in both the performance and longevity of automotive suspension systems, providing a compelling case for further development and real-world implementation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it