MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409074157 · doi:10.46292/sci24-00036

Peripheral Vascular Dysfunction Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2025· review· en· W4409074157 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Thordarson, Tiev Miller, Martín Calderón‐Juárez, Ali Hosseinzadeh, Raza N. Malik, Rahul Sachdeva, Andrei V. Krassioukov

Bibliographic record

VenueTopics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsGF Strong Rehabilitation CentreVancouver Coastal HealthInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSpinal cord injuryMeta-analysisInternal medicineSubgroup analysisSubclinical infectionPeripheralCardiologyPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationSpinal cord

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) has been shown to impact vascular function and increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, data are limited regarding prognostic factors for identifying subclinical CVD risk in individuals with SCI. Objectives: To identify maladaptive structural and functional changes to central and peripheral vasculature resulting from SCI and to assess the effect of SCI on these parameters relative to able-bodied comparators. Methods: This review was prospectively registered. A systematic search was performed using PRISMA guidelines. Bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I and AHRQ tools. Studies reporting structural or functional changes to vasculature following SCI were included. Data on participant and injury characteristics, outcomes, and assessments used were extracted. Meta-analyses were conducted for adequately powered subgroups based on outcome type, measurement site, and level of injury. Results: A total of 49 studies involving 1026 individuals with SCI and 941 able-bodied comparators were included. Most studies described injury level and severity using standardized impairment classifications. Subgroup analyses showed significantly reduced arterial diameter, compliance, endothelial function, blood flow volume, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentration among people with SCI compared to controls. Intima-media thickness, arterial stiffness, shear rate, and blood glucose and triglyceride concentrations were significantly greater for people with SCI compared to controls. Additional subgroup analyses were underpowered. Conclusion: This review synthesizes the current literature reporting central and peripheral vasculature outcomes in people with SCI and able-bodied controls. Between-group differences were observed for several structural and functional vascular outcomes, which suggests that SCI has a significant impact on multiple subclinical CVD risk factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0150.022
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTopics in Spinal Cord Injury RehabilitationSame topicSpinal Cord Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207