MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409076593 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2025.3555127

An Ultrasensitive MOEMS Platform Relied on an Adjustable Defect Width for Label-Free Bioparticle Detection

2025· article· en· W4409076593 on OpenAlexaff
Yashar Gholami, Behnam Saghirzadeh Darki, Mohammad Hossein Poorghadiri Isfahani, Kian Jafari, Taha Azad

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiosensors and Analytical Detection
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a novel optomechanical surface stress-based biosensor. The proposed device employs a functionalized microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) transducer to capture the target bioparticles in the sample. The interaction of the bioreceptors immobilized on the transducer surface with the target bioparticles modifies the transducer’s surface stress, which results in its deformation. The accurate measurement of the transducer deformation allows for label-free detection of the target bioparticles and their concentration. In order to measure the transducer deformation, an optical system consisting of a defective 1-D photonic crystal with adjustable defect width is utilized, which significantly enhances the sensor sensitivity. This BioMEMS platform exhibits improved functional characteristics, including a bandwidth (BW) of 5 kHz, full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of 0.8 nm, quality factor of 1822.5, mechanical sensitivity of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$13.5~\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula>m/Nm<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${}^{-{1}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, optical sensitivity of 1.02, and total sensitivity of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$13.775~\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula>m/Nm<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${}^{-{1}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>. These functional characteristics demonstrate the capability of the proposed sensor to detect various diseases in their early stages or progression, which is highly desirable in point-of-care testing (POCT) applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.815

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicBiosensors and Analytical DetectionFrench-language works237,207