Seamless Interaction through Gesture Recognition: Integrating Virtual Canvas, Keyboard, Calculator And Mouse with Voice Assistance on a Unified Platform
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper discusses the project ‘Seamless Interaction through Gesture Recognition,’ which is a system designed for the human-computer interaction without touching any tool, it simulates it virtually through three gadgets: a gesture-controlled mouse with voice recognition facilities, an air-based keyboard, calculator and a drawing canvas. In order to interpret the hand movements, gestures, and voice commands that are captured by the webcam and microphone, the system applies computer vision, machine learning, and speech recognition technologies. Hand motions made by the virtual mouse communicate to the computer what actions are to be done and where to locate the cursor. Additionally, the computer recognizes the voice commands which are an aide to such usage. The virtual keyboard, on its part, suggests finger positions through the air as keystrokes, virtual calculator processes a calculation based on hand gestures, and the virtual drawing tool is the one that notices the hand actions that it changes into digital artwork. All of these were developed by the OpenCV and MediaPipe frameworks, the programs that allow correct real-time hand tracking and gesture identification. The findings are a valuable contribution to computer interaction formation, which can lead to a decrease in the use of physical interaction devices and a shift to more natural interaction methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".