A Powerful Relationship: The Interdependence of Action Research and Social Justice Work
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In an age where political and global leaders are making decisions that impact our communities on a very personal level (such as access to produce, water, land, life, education, and healthcare), it is important to take time to think about the need for community to be in conversation with one another in order to address conflicts that are often based in political agendas, political tensions, and political ideologies.We are in a time in which we see tariff wars, immigration policies becoming exclusionary, and land-based wars happening across the globe connected with people we love.As a result we see poverty, bloodshed, and suffering.Many of us, as individual human beings are experiencing feelings of pain, fear, and sadness, and thus, we must acknowledge these feelings and experiences as a community with a voice for collective humanity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.146 | 0.117 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.144 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.039 | 0.033 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.037 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.018 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".