MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409084983 · doi:10.3390/rs17071256

SAMNet++: A Segment Anything Model for Supervised 3D Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation

2025· article· en· W4409084983 on OpenAlexaff
Mohsen Shahraki, Ahmed Elamin, Ahmed El‐Rabbany

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoint cloudComputer scienceSegmentationArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Segmentation of 3D point clouds is essential for applications such as environmental monitoring and autonomous navigation, where making accurate distinctions between different classes from high-resolution 3D datasets is critical. Segmenting 3D point clouds often requires a trade-off between preserving spatial information and achieving computational efficiency. In this paper, we present SAMNet++, a hybrid 3D segmentation model that integrates segment anything model (SAM) and adopted PointNet++ in a sequential two-stage pipeline. Firstly, SAM performs an initial unsupervised segmentation, which is then refined using adopted PointNet++ to improve the accuracy. The key innovations of SAMNet++ include its hybrid architecture, which combines SAM’s generalization with PointNet++’s local feature extraction, and a feature refinement strategy that enhances precision while reducing computational overhead. Additionally, SAMNet++ minimizes the reliance on extensive supervised training, while maintaining high accuracy. The proposed model is tested on three urban datasets, which are collected by an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). The proposed SAMNet++ model demonstrates high segmentation performance, achieving accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score values above 0.97 across all classes on our experimental datasets. Furthermore, its mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 86.93% on a public benchmark dataset signifies a more balanced and precise segmentation across all classes, surpassing previous state-of-the-art methods. In addition to its improved accuracy, SAMNet++ showcases remarkable computational efficiency, requiring almost half the processing time of standard PointNet++ and nearly one-sixteenth of the time needed by the original PointNet algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score0.787

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207