SAMNet++: A Segment Anything Model for Supervised 3D Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Segmentation of 3D point clouds is essential for applications such as environmental monitoring and autonomous navigation, where making accurate distinctions between different classes from high-resolution 3D datasets is critical. Segmenting 3D point clouds often requires a trade-off between preserving spatial information and achieving computational efficiency. In this paper, we present SAMNet++, a hybrid 3D segmentation model that integrates segment anything model (SAM) and adopted PointNet++ in a sequential two-stage pipeline. Firstly, SAM performs an initial unsupervised segmentation, which is then refined using adopted PointNet++ to improve the accuracy. The key innovations of SAMNet++ include its hybrid architecture, which combines SAM’s generalization with PointNet++’s local feature extraction, and a feature refinement strategy that enhances precision while reducing computational overhead. Additionally, SAMNet++ minimizes the reliance on extensive supervised training, while maintaining high accuracy. The proposed model is tested on three urban datasets, which are collected by an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). The proposed SAMNet++ model demonstrates high segmentation performance, achieving accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score values above 0.97 across all classes on our experimental datasets. Furthermore, its mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 86.93% on a public benchmark dataset signifies a more balanced and precise segmentation across all classes, surpassing previous state-of-the-art methods. In addition to its improved accuracy, SAMNet++ showcases remarkable computational efficiency, requiring almost half the processing time of standard PointNet++ and nearly one-sixteenth of the time needed by the original PointNet algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".