MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409085672 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/003

Fast simulation of cosmological neutral hydrogen based on the halo model

2025· article· en· W4409085672 on OpenAlexaff
Pascal Hitz, Pascale Berner, Devin Crichton, John Hennig, Alexandre Réfrégier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHaloCosmological modelCosmological perturbation theoryCosmologyAstrophysicsStatistical physicsTheoretical physicsGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cosmological neutral hydrogen (HI) surveys provide a promising tomographic probe of the post-reionization era and of the standard model of cosmology. Simulations of this signal are crucial for maximizing the utility of these surveys. We present a fast method for simulating the cosmological distribution of HI based on a halo model approach. Employing the approximate PINOCCHIO code, we generate the past light cone of dark matter halos. Subsequently, the halos are populated with HI according to a HI-halo mass relation. The nature of 21 cm intensity mapping demands large-volume simulations with a high halo mass resolution. To fulfill both requirements, we simulate a past light cone for declinations between -15° and -35° in the frequency range from 700 to 800 MHz, matching HIRAX, the Hydrogen Intensity and Real-time Analysis eXperiment. We run PINOCCHIO for a 1 h -3 Gpc 3 box with 6700 3 simulation particles. With this configuration, halos with masses as low as M min = 4.3 × 10 9 M ⊙ are simulated, resulting in the recovery of more than 97% of the expected HI density. From the dark matter and HI past light cone, maps with a width of 5 MHz are created. To validate the simulation, we have implemented and present here an analytical dark matter and HI halo model in PyCosmo , a Python package tailored for theoretical cosmological predictions. We perform extensive comparisons between analytical predictions and the simulation for the mass function, mass density, power spectrum, and angular power spectrum for dark matter and HI. We find close agreement in the mass function and mass densities, with discrepancies within a few percent. For the three-dimensional power spectra and angular power spectra, we observe an agreement better than 10%. This approach is broadly applicable for forecasting and forward-modeling of dedicated intensity mapping experiments, such as HIRAX, as well as cosmological surveys with the SKA. Additionally, it is particularly well suited to be extended for cross-correlation studies. The PyCosmo halo model extension and simulation datasets are made publicly available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle PhysicsSame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207