MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409087031 · doi:10.1002/wer.70066

Chemical disinfection of secondary municipal wastewater effluents: Optimizing CT dose and tailing effects through high‐intensity mixing

2025· article· en· W4409087031 on OpenAlexaff
Naghmeh Fallah, Katherine Y. Bell, Ted Mao, Ronald Hofmann, Gabriela Ellen Barreto Bossoni, Domenico Santoro, Giuseppe Mele

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Environment Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of TorontoMW Canada (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMixing (physics)EffluentChemistrySodium hypochloriteIntensity (physics)WastewaterSewage treatmentPulp and paper industryEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper investigates the impact of average velocity gradient and mixing effects on secondary wastewater coliform inactivation kinetics using an innovative in‐line treatment technology based on sodium hypochlorite as disinfecting agent. Experiments included both laboratory batch kinetic studies (as reference) as well as bench‐scale pilot tests. The laboratory studies were carried out using a magnetically stirred vessel to simulate low‐mixing conditions (Ḡ ≈ 1000 s −1 at 1 atm), while the bench‐scale pilot tests employed a flow‐through system consisting of two centrifugal pumps in series to simulate high average velocity gradients and intense mixing conditions (Ḡ ≈ 10,000 s −1 at 1.5 atm). In both cases, disinfectant demand and decay models for sodium hypochlorite were fitted against observed data using various expressions corresponding to different kinetic orders and subsequently incorporated into fecal inactivation kinetics via their integral CT expression. Experimental results showed a very remarkable and significant influence of high velocity gradient and mixing intensity on disinfection efficiency. While conventional batch kinetics indicated a 3‐log reduction in fecal coliforms at concentration‐time integral product (CT) of 16 (mg·min·L −1 ), less than 1/10th of the CT dose (under comparable process conditions) were needed in the case of advanced disinfection with high average velocity gradient and mixing intensity. Using the experimental data collected in this study, a novel inactivation model was developed that uniquely incorporates the average velocity gradient Ḡ as explicitly kinetic parameter, enabling precise prediction of CT required for various mixing conditions to meet specific microbial treatment targets. To achieve an effluent total coliform concentration of 10 CFU per 100 mL, a CT of 48.5 mg·min·L −1 was required at a mixing intensity of Ḡ = 762 s −1 , while only 0.82 mg·min·L −1 was needed at Ḡ = 18,158 s −1 . Inactivation tailing was drastically reduced under high‐mixing conditions by enhancing disinfectant penetration in the flocs shielding particle‐associated coliforms. Furthermore, disinfection by‐product (DBP) screening tests confirmed that enhanced inactivation under high‐mixing conditions was achieved while also maintaining regulated DBP levels across all CT values. This integration of mixing effects in microbial inactivation kinetics marks a significant advancement over traditional disinfection design frameworks allowing the disinfection community to access a more refined approach for sizing and validation purposes. PRACTITIONER POINTS Particle‐associated coliforms are inactivated by hypochlorite under high mixing. A 3‐log reduction of coliforms observed at more than 30 times lower CT under high mixing. High mixing and mild pressure can reduce chlorine dose and contact time significantly. Tailing effects are well mitigated by high mixing combined with sodium hypochlorite. An inactivation model for coliform bacteria accounting for mixing intensity is proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Environment ResearchSame topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207