OP3.5 Does Patient Resiliency Influence Patient-reported outcomes at Presentation in Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: Resilience, quantified by the brief resilience scale (BRS), has been recognized for its role in pain and symptomatology in musculoskeletal conditions. The role of psychological factors in the clinical presentation and outcomes of FAI surgery continues to be poorly understood. Methods: This is a prospective multicenter study of FAI patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy. PROMs were administered at baseline, 3-, and 6-months post-op and included the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains of anxiety and depression, as well as Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (HOOS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12). Resilience was characterized by BRS score and divided into low (“L”, score<3), normal (“N”, score 3-4.3), and high resilience (“H”, score>4.3). Results: 675 patients were included with a mean age of 24.9±7.8 years and female predominance (56%). Mean BRS scores were 3.7±0.7 (1.5-5.0). 13.8% (n=93) had low resilience, 65.9% (n=445) had normal resilience, and 20.3% (n=137) had high resilience. Lower resilience had more severe symptoms in HOOS pain (p<0.001), HOOS sports (p=0.003), HOOS ADL (p<0.001), HOOS QoL (p<0.001), iHOT-12 (p=0.002), and mHHS (p<0.001). Anxiety (L: 50.5%/N: 14.4%/H: 2.2%) and depression (L: 38.7%/N: 8.8%/H: 2.9%) were higher in lower resilience groups (all p<0.001) and this trend stayed consistent in female and male sub-analyses with females having greater anxiety and depression symptoms. The follow-up cohort with 3- and 6-months follow-up was 487 patients and had similar baseline characteristics as the baseline cohort. Lower resilience had lower postoperative PROs (with similar change) (p<0.05). After treatment, rates of anxiety or depression decreased from 22.1% to 15.6% with the low resilience group having the highest change from 62.9% to 45.9%. Conclusion: Low resilience correlates with more severe symptoms and predicts anxiety/depression in FAI. 13.8% had low resilience while 20.3% had high resilience. Lower resilience had worse postoperative PROs. Particularly in patients with low resilience at presentation, rates of anxiety or depression symptoms decreased postoperatively. Further studies are needed to understand the role of resilience in longer-term outcomes of FAI and whether concurrent psychological treatment will help improve patient outcomes after hip arthroscopy for FAI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".