MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409088992 · doi:10.7202/1117237ar

<i>Ad esse filium</i> : foi et mouvement chez Maître Eckhart

2025· article· fr· W4409088992 on OpenAlex
Yves Meessen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLaval théologique et philosophique · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicKarl Barth and Christian Theology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accorder la félicité intellectuelle avec la vie bienheureuse, telle est la voie originale empruntée par Maître Eckhart. Plutôt que d’insister sur une « vision différée », Eckhart plaide en faveur d’une « vie immédiate ». La nuance entre vision et vie est déterminante. Tout en maintenant que la foi n’est pas la vision, Eckhart montre que la vie est le lieu d’une expérience possible de l’union à Dieu, sous certaines conditions. Sa « théologie de la béatitude » induit une réévaluation de l’articulation entre foi et raison. Dérogeant à l’« épistémologie générale du savoir » dominante au tournant du xiii e et xiv e siècle, Eckhart intègre le dict dionysien selon lequel : « Toutes les affirmations sur Dieu sont dites incompactes, mais les négations sont vraies ». C’est par voie de participation à la cause que l’affirmation trouve son sens. Le passage du probable à la vérité se passe dans le « pâtir » ( pathein ) que l’on ne peut « enseigner » ( mathein ) en tant quel tel : divina patiendo, non discendo ab ex tra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it