MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409089398 · doi:10.1101/2025.04.01.646635

Primary envelopment of Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus at the nucleoplasmic reticulum

2025· preprint· en· W4409089398 on OpenAlexaff
Alexa Wilson, Neale D. Ridgway, Craig McCormick

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInner membraneBiologyEnvelopmentVirologyCapsidNuclear laminaMembrane curvatureMolecular biologyCell biologyVirusNuclear proteinMembraneBiochemistryTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Herpesvirus egress begins with primary envelopment of newly assembled capsids at the inner nuclear membrane (INM) facilitated by a viral nuclear egress complex (NEC). Primary envelopment has been observed at the peripheral INM as well as at structures known as nuclear infoldings. Nuclear infoldings resulting from invaginations of the INM are known as Type-I nucleoplasmic reticulum (NR), whereas infoldings of both INM and outer nuclear membrane (ONM) are known as Type-II NR. Here, we report that Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) reactivation from latency and lytic cycle progression correlates with increases in both types of NR invaginations, but primary envelopment was restricted to Type-I NR and the peripheral INM. Over a time-course of infection, DNA-containing KSHV C-capsids were frequently observed budding into nuclear infoldings contiguous with the INM and sparsely decorated with nuclear lamina, characteristic of Type-I NR. These Type-I NR structures co-localized with puncta containing CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase (CCTα), the enzyme that catalyzes the rate-limiting step in phosphatidylcholine (PtdCho) synthesis, and drives de novo membrane biogenesis and membrane curvature required for NR expansion; this may provide sufficient Type-I NR to match requirements for KSHV nuclear egress. The selective utilization of the Type-I NR for primary envelopment despite the concurrent expansion of the Type-II NR suggests a mechanism to target C-capsids into the Type-I NR. We also observed accumulation of de-enveloped KSHV C-capsids in 2 nd order nuclear infoldings, suggesting that primary envelopment and de-envelopment can occur not only at the nuclear periphery, but also at the Type-I NR. Importance Herpesvirus capsids assemble in the cell nucleus but are too large to exit via nuclear pores. Instead, they invade the inner nuclear membrane and acquire a provisional lipid envelope that is quickly shed through fusion with the outer nuclear membrane, a neat trick that delivers the capsid to the cytoplasm for subsequent steps in assembly and egress. Dynamic rearrangements of the nuclear membrane include invaginations that plumb the depths of the nucleus to facilitate cargo trafficking. Here, we demonstrate that during Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) replication, nuclear membrane infolding and expansion events increase, coinciding with recruitment of a host enzyme required for phosphatidyl choline synthesis to these sites. We observed an abundance of KSHV capsids at infoldings of the inner nuclear membrane, as well as free capsids in the interior of second order infoldings suggestive of de-envelopment events occurring prior to infold retraction. This complements a more well-established mechanism of KSHV egress at the nuclear periphery, and indeed, we observed concomitant egress of KSHV capsids via both mechanisms from the same nucleus. Similar observations for other herpesviruses by other groups suggests that this versatility in nuclear egress mechanisms is conserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments→French-language works237,207→