Assessment of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Predicting Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) Response in Unresectable Breast Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Patients with advanced breast cancer (BC) may be treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for tumor control. Variable treatment responses are a clinical challenge and there is a need to predict tumor radiosensitivity a priori. There is evidence showing that tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are markers for chemotherapy response; however, this association has not yet been validated in breast radiation therapy. This pilot study investigates the computational analysis of TILs to predict SABR response in patients with inoperable BC. Methods: Patients with inoperable breast cancer (n = 22) were included for analysis and classified into partial response (n = 12) and stable disease (n = 10) groups. Pre-treatment tumor biopsies (n = 104) were prepared, digitally imaged, and underwent computational analysis. Whole slide images (WSIs) were pre-processed, and then a pre-trained convolutional neural network model (CNN) was employed to identify the regions of interest. The TILs were annotated, and spatial graph features were extracted. The clinical and spatial features were collected and analyzed using machine learning (ML) classifiers, including K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machines (SVMs), and Gaussian Naïve Bayes (GNB), to predict the SABR response. The models were evaluated using receiver operator characteristics (ROCs) and area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Results: The KNN, SVM, and GNB models were implemented using clinical and graph features. Among the generated prediction models, the graph features showed higher predictive performances compared to the models containing clinical features alone. The highest-performing model, using computationally derived graph features, showed an AUC of 0.92, while the highest clinical model showed an AUC of 0.62 within unseen test sets. Conclusions: Spatial TIL models demonstrate strong potential for predicting SABR response in inoperable breast cancer. TILs indicate a higher independent predictive performance than clinical-level features alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".