MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Method for Data Aggregation in Internet of Things (IoT) Networks Using Colored Petri Net (CPN) Modeling and Reinforcement Learning (RL)

2024· article· en· W4409097902 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSecurity in Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningInternet of ThingsComputer sciencePetri netThe InternetArtificial intelligenceColoredComputer networkDistributed computingWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel method for data aggregation in Internet of Things (IoT) networks, utilizing Colored Petri Net (CPN) modeling and Reinforcement Learning (RL) to outperform traditional data aggregation techniques in terms of energy consumption, end-to-end delay, and network lifetime. Experimental results indicate that the proposed method achieves a 20-25% reduction in energy consumption, 15-20% lower end-to-end delay, and a 20-25% increase in network lifetime. These findings provide scalability and improved quality of service for resource-constrained IoT applications. Potential challenges include computational overhead, convergence time, and security concerns, necessitating further research. Future research directions involve integrating the method with edge computing, real-world deployment testing, developing hybrid algorithms, exploring adaptive reward functions, and assessing the environmental impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score0.692

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSecurity in Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207