MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409098542 · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(24)00325-6

Changes in incarceration and tuberculosis notifications from prisons during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe and the Americas: a time-series analysis of national surveillance data

2025· article· en· W4409098542 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Amy Zheng, Lena Faust, Anthony Harries, Pedro Avedillo, Michael Akodu, Beatriz Barreto‐Duarte, Bruno B. Andrade, César Ugarte‐Gil, Alberto L Garcia-Basteiro, Marcos Espinal, Joshua L. Warren, Leonardo Martínez

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune responses and vaccinations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchPan American Health OrganizationNational Institutes of HealthFundação Oswaldo Cruz
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakTuberculosisVirologyBetacoronavirusMedicineCriminologyPsychologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)PathologyOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted tuberculosis control programmes globally; whether or not this disproportionately affected people who were incarcerated is unknown. We aimed to evaluate changes in incarceration and tuberculosis notifications in prisons in Europe and the Americas during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Data from WHO Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) and WHO Europe were used to conduct a joint hierarchical Bayesian negative binomial time-series. This approach accounted for world region, country-specific temporal trends, and country-specific autocorrelated random effects to simultaneously model and predict both annual prison population (ie, the offset) and prison tuberculosis cases (ie, the primary outcome). Results were used to calculate percentage differences between predicted and observed annual tuberculosis notifications and prison populations during the COVID-19 pandemic years (2020-22). FINDINGS: In total, 22 of 39 countries from PAHO and 25 of 53 countries from WHO Europe were included (representing 4·9 million people incarcerated annually), contributing 520 country-years of follow-up. Observed tuberculosis notifications in prisons were lower than predicted in 2020 (-26·2% [95% credible interval -66·3 to 7·8), 2021 (-46·4% [-108·8 to 3·9]), and 2022 (-48·9 [-124·4 to 10·3]). These decreasing trends were consistent across Europe and the Americas, but larger decreases were seen in low-burden settings in 2020 (-54·8% [-112·4 to -4·8]) and 2021 (-68·4% [-156·6 to -2·9]), high-burden settings in 2021 (-89·4% [-190·3 to -10·4]), and Central and North America in 2021 (-100·3% [-239·0 to -6·3]). Observed incarceration levels were similar to predicted levels (<10% difference overall) during all COVID-19 pandemic years. INTERPRETATION: Tuberculosis notifications in prisons from 47 countries in Europe and the Americas were lower than expected (at times >50% lower) during COVID-19 pandemic years, despite consistent incarceration levels. Reasons for this change in tuberculosis notifications might be multifactorial and include missed diagnoses and implementation of COVID-19 pandemic measures, reducing transmission. Greater prioritisation of people who are incarcerated is needed to ensure appropriate access to care in the face of future pandemics. FUNDING: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, National Institutes of Health, and Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Brazil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.339
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Public HealthSame topicImmune responses and vaccinationsFrench-language works237,207