MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409099439 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf527

Narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies beyond the local X-ray Universe: an X-ray spectral sample

2025· article· en· W4409099439 on OpenAlexaff
Jiachen Jiang, D. J. Walton, Luigi Gallo, A. C. Fabian, D. Grupe, R. G. McMahon, C. S. Reynolds, A. J. Young, Zhibo Yu, H. Liu, Zuobin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
FundersLeibniz-GemeinschaftLeibniz-Institut für Astrophysik PotsdamUniversität HamburgMax-Planck-GesellschaftScience and Technology Facilities CouncilEberhard Karls Universität TübingenRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität BonnRussian Academy of SciencesAmerican Institute of Physics
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxyUniverseAstronomyX-rayLine (geometry)Sample (material)Spectral lineOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Narrow-line Seyfert 1 AGNs (NLS1s) represent a unique stage in the black hole growth history, characterized by low black hole masses of approximately $10^{6}$–$10^{8}$ solar masses and around-Eddington accretion rates. X-ray studies of NLS1s have largely been confined to the local Universe ($z < 0.2$), while their broad-line counterparts and radio-loud quasars have been more extensively investigated at higher redshifts. In this work, we conducted an X-ray spectral analysis for 14 SDSS-observed NLS1s at $z\approx 1$ in the eRASS1 catalogue. We found that all of their eROSITA observations agree with the expected rest-frame 2 keV monochromatic luminosity given their rest-frame 2500 Å monochromatic luminosity, further supporting evidence of AGN emission. Secondly, when fitted with a power-law model, most continuum spectra between 0.7 and 7 keV in their rest frames necessitate photon indices $\Gamma \gtrsim 2.5$. Notably, the highest photon index of around 4.7 in one of our NLS1 AGNs hints at a significant contribution from soft excess emission. Finally, our analysis demonstrates that we can align the Eddington ratios with optical measurements by applying a correction factor between 10 and 120 to their X-ray luminosity. Although measurement uncertainty remains considerable, our findings suggest that assumptions for the standard geometrically thin accretion disc model made in previous estimations of this correction factor may not apply to near or super-Eddington NLS1 AGNs. Finally, we also compare this sample with extremely variable nearby NLS1s and other X-ray-weak AGNs, such as JWST-observed, broad-line AGNs at $z=5-6$, and underscores the importance of deeper X-ray surveys for more X-ray-weak NLS1s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207