ABO blood group and COVID-19 severity: Associations with endothelial and adipocyte activation in critically ill patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: ABO blood group has been implicated both in susceptibility to, and severity of, SARS-CoV-2 infection. The aim of this study was to explore a potential association between ABO blood group and severity of COVID-19 infection in critically ill patients and the following biological mechanisms: inflammatory cytokines, endothelial injury, and adipokines. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 128 critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to Vancouver General Hospital from March 2020-March 2021. Outcomes including 28-day mortality, need for mechanical ventilation and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay were compared between patients with A & AB blood type vs. B & O blood type. Likewise, serum inflammatory markers, markers of endothelial activation, and adipokines were compared. RESULTS: The association between ABO and severity of disease was confirmed. Patients with A&AB blood group had more frequent ventilation requirements compared to patients with blood group B&O (N(%): 35 (71%) vs 41 (52%), p = 0.041), higher total ICU mortality (14 (29%) vs 9 (11%), p = 0.018), longer median ICU stay (days, median [interquartile range]: 10 [6-19], vs 7 [3-14], p = 0.016) and longer median hospital stay (26 [14-36] vs. 17 [10-30] p = 0.034). No association was found between ABO blood group and serum inflammatory cytokines or their receptors [IL-6, IL-1b, IL-10, TNF, sIL-6R, sgp130] measured within the first 10 days of ICU stay. No association was found between ABO and plasma markers of endothelial injury [Thrombomodulin, ADAMTS13, sP-Selectin, Factor IX, Protein C, Protein S, vWF]. Among the plasma adipokines, there were no differences between lipocalin-2, PAI-1 or resistin. Notably, however, median adipsin was higher in patients with A&AB blood group compared to O&B (16.3 [4.2-38.5] x106 pg/mL vs. 9.61 [3.0-20.8] x 106 pg/mL, p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective single-center study confirms an association between A and AB blood type with more severe COVID-19. While an underlying mechanism was not identified, the finding of higher adipsin levels in patients with type A/AB blood warrants further investigation in larger prospective studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".