Foreign Investment and Housing Market Stability in Developing Economies: Empirical Evidence from Malaysia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sustainable property development in developing economies requires a careful balance between attracting foreign capital and maintaining housing affordability for local residents. While foreign direct investment (FDI) serves as a crucial engine for economic growth by enhancing productive capacity and international competitiveness, its effects on local housing markets remain inadequately understood in policy frameworks. This study examines how economic development strategies can be designed to harness FDI benefits while preventing residential market distortions in rapidly industrializing regions. Using Malaysia’s Kulim Hi-Tech Park and Batu Kawan Industrial Park as empirical cases, we analyze the relationship between foreign capital inflows and residential property prices from 2000 to 2022 through time-series regression analysis supplemented by stakeholder consultations. Our findings reveal that FDI significantly influences housing price dynamics in industrial zones, with both positive economic spillovers and challenges for housing affordability. The results demonstrate that targeted policy interventions—including affordable housing mandates, developer incentives, and strategic land use planning—can effectively moderate price appreciation while maintaining investment attractiveness. This research contributes to evidence-based policymaking by identifying integrated mechanisms that promote sustainable and inclusive growth in emerging economies seeking to balance industrial advancement with equitable housing access. The Malaysian experience offers valuable practical insights for policymakers in developing nations navigating the complex relationship between international investment, housing markets, and social welfare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".