MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409108531 · doi:10.1148/ryai.240628

Predicting Respiratory Disease Mortality Risk Using Open-Source AI on Chest Radiographs in an Asian Health Screening Population

2025· article· en· W4409108531 on OpenAlexaff
Jong Hyuk Lee, Seung Ho Choi, Hugo J.W.L. Aerts, Jakob Weiss, Vineet K. Raghu, Michael T. Lu, Jayoun Kim, Seung Ho Lee, Dongheon Lee, Hyungjin Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiology Artificial Intelligence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeQuartileHazard ratioPopulationRetrospective cohort studyConfidence intervalInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The open-source artificial intelligence CXR-Lung-Risk model predicted respiratory disease mortality in an Asian cohort using baseline and follow-up chest radiographs, facilitating a two-layer risk stratification approach through longitudinal analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiology Artificial IntelligenceSame topicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIFrench-language works237,207