MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409114779 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2025.37

The relationship between induced three-dimensional vortical structures in the wake and the drag of a profiled blunt trailing edge body

2025· article· en· W4409114779 on OpenAlexafffund
Ross Cruikshank, Satoshi Baba, Philippe Lavoie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWakeTrailing edgeDragMechanicsBluntDrag coefficientLift-induced dragAngle of attackVortex sheddingPhysicsMaterials scienceTurbulenceReynolds numberAerodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three-dimensional wake forcing is applied to a profiled blunt trailing edge body from synthetic jet arrays distributed symmetrically on both sides of the body. The effect on the wake is experimentally studied at Reynolds numbers based on body thickness, $d$ , of $2500 \leqslant Re_d=u_\infty d/\nu \leqslant 5000$ in the turbulent wake regime. The exits of the synthetic jets are rectangular slots and are oriented spanwise to the cross-flow with a uniform spacing of $2.4d$ . The forcing causes spanwise variations in the separated shear layers, leading to the von Kármán vortices tilting and forming coherent streamwise vortex loops. This reorientation of the wake vorticity is associated with the attenuation of the vortex street and drag reduction, consistent with previous studies of spanwise perturbations to wakes. The effect of forcing amplitude on the drag and wake structure is examined. It is found that the mean shedding frequency is constant across the span in all cases, indicating that the forced wake has a periodic organised structure. The greatest drag reduction of approximately 25 % is achieved when the vortical structures emitted by the jets penetrate up the edges of the boundary layers of the body, which occurs at velocity ratios (defined from the mean jet exit velocity during expulsion) of about 3 when $Re_d=2500$ and about 2 when $Re_d=5000$ . This study presents evidence that the forcing effectiveness is maximised when the vortex street is most tilted into the streamwise direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.201

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207