MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409118134 · doi:10.1145/3712678.3721875

CAQ: Connection-Aware Adaptive QUIC Configurations for Enhanced Video Streaming

2025· article· en· W4409118134 on OpenAlexafffund
Jashanjot Singh Sidhu, Abdelhak Bentaleb

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsComputer scienceConnection (principal bundle)Video streamingComputer networkServerMultimediaEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

QUIC is rapidly emerging as the de facto standard for video streaming, particularly with the advent of 5G technology enabling the delivery of high resolution 4K content. However, sudden fluctuations in network capacity between 4G and 5G networks can occur due to various factors, such as network congestion, user mobility, or physical obstructions, leading to rapid changes in available bandwidth, which pose significant challenges for HTTP Adaptive Streaming (HAS) sessions that rely on more stable data rates for smooth playback, often resulting in interruptions and degraded Quality of Experience (QoE). Furthermore, current QUIC implementations are characterized by static configuration parameters, including constant pacing rates and static buffer sizes. This rigidity limits the server's ability to adapt dynamically to the client's real-time network conditions, making it challenging to prevent playback stalls and improve user QoE. To address these issues, we propose Connection-Aware QUIC (CAQ), which utilizes encrypted client playback statistics to dynamically adjust server parameters and implement an adaptive pacing rate. This approach aims to optimize streaming performance and enhance user experience, even in highly fluctuating network conditions. To evaluate the performance of CAQ, we conduct a series of trace-driven experiments across two key streaming modes: Video-on-Demand (VoD) and Low-Latency Live (LLL). Experimental results demonstrate that CAQ improves the VMAF by ~4%, QoEyin by ~41% while reducing rebuffering duration by ~8% for VoD mode and improves the VMAF by ~7%, QoEyin by ~49% with comparable rebuffering for LLL mode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207