A rapid review of the avian influenza PB2 E627K mutation in human infection studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The current avian influenza A(H5N1) epizootic poses a significant threat to public health, with sporadic infections in humans raising concerns about potential adaptation for efficient human transmission. Laboratory studies have provided evidence that the polymerase basic protein 2 (PB2) E627K mutation facilitates more efficient replication in mammals and humans. This mutation has been detected in Canadian poultry, wild birds and mammals. Objective: Our objective was to summarize the current state of evidence on the impact of the avian influenza PB2 E627K mutation on human adaptation, transmission, epidemiology and clinical outcomes in natural human infections. Methods: We employed a search strategy across MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Global Health and CAB Abstracts for articles published from each database's inception until mid-May 2023. Results: We identified nine eligible articles for review that addressed human transmission or adaptation (n=5), epidemiological or clinical implication (n=1) or both topics (n=3). Some studies suggested that the PB2 E627K mutation may play a role in zoonotic transmission from birds to humans, with studies indicating its association with parallel evolution and positive selection in A(H5) and A(H7) viruses. Other studies presented analyses that supported the notion of an increased fatality rate among cases with the PB2 E627K mutation, highlighting its potential role as a virulence factor. Conclusion: The association of the PB2 E627K mutation with human adaptation, transmission and increased fatality rates highlights the importance of genomic surveillance under One Health umbrella. Further research is warranted to explore the role of this mutation and determine how it interacts with other mutations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.028 | 0.023 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".