SPINEX-symbolic regression: similarity-based symbolic regression with explainable neighbors exploration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article introduces a new symbolic regression algorithm based on the SPINEX (similarity-based predictions with explainable neighbors exploration) family. This new algorithm (SPINEX_SymbolicRegression) adopts a similarity-based approach to identifying high-merit expressions that satisfy accuracy- and structural similarity metrics. We conducted extensive benchmarking tests comparing SPINEX_SymbolicRegression to over 180 mathematical benchmarking functions from international problem sets that span randomly generated expressions and those based on real physical phenomena. Then, we evaluated the performance of the proposed algorithm in terms of accuracy, expression similarity in terms of presence operators and variables (as compared to the actual expressions), population size, and number of generations at convergence. The results indicate that SPINEX_SymbolicRegression consistently performs well and can, in some instances, outperform leading algorithms. In addition, the algorithm’s explainability capabilities are highlighted through in-depth experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it