MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409123004 · doi:10.1111/ijun.70009

Does <scp>SMS</scp> Message Sent by Nurse After Radical Prostatectomy Affect Quality of Life?

2025· article· en· W4409123004 on OpenAlexaff
Elif Nur Karasu, İşıl Işik Andsoy

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Urological Nursing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDigital Mental Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAffect (linguistics)ProstatectomyQuality (philosophy)UrologyNursingInternal medicineProstate cancerCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Is there any effect of discharge education content delivered via SMS by nurses on the quality‐of‐life scores of patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy (RP)? Although RP offers the greatest potential for a definitive cure in localised prostate cancer and improves overall survival, it is associated with various psychosocial and psychological challenges after the discharge period. These issues can lead to decreased patients' quality of life. Surgical treatment‐specific side effects can lead to some problems. So, patients are often unprepared for posttreatment self‐management at home. A structured follow‐up programme following surgery is necessary to increase quality of life and decrease some undesirable complications. Discharge training via SMS messages sent by clinical nurses may increase quality of life in patients after RP. This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the effect of SMS messages containing discharge information sent by nurses on the quality of life of patients who underwent RP. This quasi‐experimental study was conducted from May to December 2022, with 57 patients (29 in the intervention and 28 in the control group) who underwent RP in Istanbul, Turkiye. The intervention group received routine follow‐up and discharge information via SMS message twice a week between 09:00 and 17:00 on Mondays and Thursdays for four weeks. The control group received routine information. A ‘Descriptive Characteristics Form’ and the ‘SF‐36 Quality of Life Scale’ were used as data collection tools. The data was evaluated by descriptive statistics and paired‐sample t‐tests. The study findings indicated that the average scores across all SF‐36 Quality of Life Scale subdimensions (physical functioning, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, vitality, mental health, social role functioning and general health perceptions) were significantly higher in the intervention group after one month (p ⟨ 0.01). Postoperative SMS messages sent by clinical nurses increased patients' quality of life. These findings underscore the importance of discharge information reminders via SMS text messages by clinical nurses following RP for enhancing patients' quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.386 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Urological NursingSame topicDigital Mental Health InterventionsFrench-language works237,207