Spinal Cord Tract Integrity in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of spinal dysfunction globally. Despite surgical intervention, motor dysfunction may persist in many patients. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively examine specific spinal cord tract changes in patients with DCM, to better understand potential substrates for compensatory recovery of function. METHODS: Cervical spinal cord MRI scans with diffusion tensor imaging were performed in patients with DCM and in healthy volunteers. Spinal Cord Toolbox was used to register the PAM50 template, which includes a probabilistic atlas of the white matter tracts of the spinal cord, to the imaging data. Fractional anisotropy (FA) was extracted for each tract at C3 above the level of maximal compression and compared between patients with DCM and healthy volunteers and between patients with mild vs moderate to severe DCM. RESULTS: We included 25 patients with DCM (13 mild and 12 moderate to severe) and 6 healthy volunteers. FA was significantly reduced in DCM subjects relative to healthy volunteers for the lateral corticospinal tract (mild DCM vs healthy ∆ = -0.13, P = .018; moderate to severe DCM vs healthy ∆ = -0.11, P = .047), fasciculus gracilis (mild DCM vs healthy ∆ = -0.16, P = .010; moderate to severe DCM vs healthy ∆ = -0.13, P = .039), and fasciculus cuneatus (mild DCM vs healthy ∆ = -0.16, P = .007; moderate to severe DCM vs healthy ∆ = -0.15, P = .012). There were no differences in FA for all tracts between mild and moderate-to-severe DCM subjects. CONCLUSION: Patients with DCM had altered diffusion tensor imaging signal in their lateral corticospinal tract, fasciculus gracilis, and fasciculus cuneatus in comparison with healthy volunteers. These findings indicate that DCM is characterized by injury to these structures, which suggests that other tracts within the cord could potentially act as substrates for compensatory motor recovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".