MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Integrating lightweight convolutional neural network with entropy-informed channel attention and adaptive spatial attention for OCT-based retinal disease classification

2025· article· en· W4409125955 on OpenAlexafffund
Md. Rayhan Ahmed, Mohamed Shehata, Patricia Lasserre

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers in Biology and Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceRetinalArtificial intelligenceMachine learningArtificial neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)OphthalmologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes an effective and lightweight contextual convolutional neural network architecture called LOCT-Net for classifying retinal diseases. The LOCT-Net adopts nested residual blocks to capture the local patterns from the optical coherence tomography brightness scans and facilitate gradient flow throughout the network. The multi-scale feature enhancement module incorporates dilation-integrated depthwise strip convolutions to extract fine-grained contextual patterns with an expanded receptive field and a gating mechanism. The extracted features are then refined by a novel feature refinement network consisting of the entropy-informed channel attention module, followed by the adaptive spatial attention module. The entropy-informed channel attention module uses the frequency distribution of pixel values to compute attention weights for spatial analysis. The adaptive spatial attention module focuses on relevant clinical regions and further refines the feature maps in a multi-kernel setting. Additionally, post-explainable artificial intelligence methods are used to provide explanations of LOCT-Net's decision-making and predictions. The LOCT-Net model has been evaluated on six benchmark datasets, demonstrating an efficient balance between performance and computational cost. With just 2.32 M trainable parameters, the proposed model addresses key challenges in retinal disease classification tasks using OCT B-scans and surpasses previous state-of-the-art methods, achieving an F1 score of 92.98%, 92.34%, 100%, 99.58%, 94.50%, and 97.14% in the OCTID, OCTDL, DUKE, SD-OCT Noor, NEH, and UCSD datasets, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputers in Biology and MedicineSame topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207